Abstract | OBJECTIVE: MATERIAL AND METHOD: Thirty-two patients with primary knee arthritis, who were randomly received single intraarticular injection of 6-ml hylan G-F 20 ( Synvisc) or HA (Hyalgan), were prospectively evaluated for clinical outcomes at a minimum 26-week follow-up. The parameters, including visual analog scale (VAS) during walking, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index and Short-Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires, were evaluated at pre-injection, then at 1 week, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks and 26 weeks, post-injection. RESULTS: There were 15 patients in both groups who were available for final follow-up with no statistical differences in demographic data, VAS during walking, WOMAC score and SF-36 score at pre-injection. There was no adverse event related to viscosupplementation using in is better than of both agents. At 26-week follow-up, patients in both groups had significantly improved VAS during walking (p < 0.01), WOMAC score (p < 0.01) and SF-36 (p < 0.05) with no statistical differences between groups. However the cost of hylan G-F 20 was much more expensive than that of HA (534 USD vs. 252 USD). CONCLUSION:
|
Authors | Yutthana Khanasuk, Teerayut Dechmaneenin, Aree Tanavalee |
Journal | Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet
(J Med Assoc Thai)
Vol. 95 Suppl 10
Pg. S92-7
(Oct 2012)
ISSN: 0125-2208 [Print] Thailand |
PMID | 23451445
(Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
|
Chemical References |
- Biocompatible Materials
- Viscosupplements
- hylan
- Hyaluronic Acid
|
Topics |
- Aged
- Biocompatible Materials
(administration & dosage, economics)
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Female
- Humans
- Hyaluronic Acid
(administration & dosage, analogs & derivatives, economics)
- Injections, Intra-Articular
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
(drug therapy)
- Prospective Studies
- Viscosupplementation
(economics, methods)
- Viscosupplements
(administration & dosage, economics)
|