Abstract | OBJECTIVES: METHODS: RESULTS: The incidence of profound shock (defined as systolic blood pressure remaining < or =75 mm Hg after intra-aortic balloon pump and inotropic agent supports) was similar in both groups (21.7% vs. 21.0%, p > .5). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenator support, which was available only for patients in group 2, was performed in the catheterization room. The results demonstrated that final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction grade 3 flow in infarct-related artery was similar between the two groups (p = .678). However, total 30-day mortality and the mortality of patients with profound shock were lower in group 2 than in group 1 (all p < .04). Additionally, the hospital survival time was remarkably longer in patients in group 2 than in patients in group 1 (p = .0005). Furthermore, multivariate analysis demonstrated that unsuccessful reperfusion, presence of advanced congestive heart failure, profound shock, and age were independent predictors of 30-day mortality (all p < .02). CONCLUSION:
|
Authors | Jiunn-Jye Sheu, Tzu-Hsien Tsai, Fan-Yen Lee, Hsiu-Yu Fang, Cheuk-Kwan Sun, Steve Leu, Cheng-Hsu Yang, Shyh-Ming Chen, Chi-Ling Hang, Yuan-Kai Hsieh, Chien-Jen Chen, Chiung-Jen Wu, Hon-Kan Yip |
Journal | Critical care medicine
(Crit Care Med)
Vol. 38
Issue 9
Pg. 1810-7
(Sep 2010)
ISSN: 1530-0293 [Electronic] United States |
PMID | 20543669
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|
Topics |
- Aged
- Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary
- Electrocardiography
- Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Myocardial Infarction
(complications, surgery)
- Shock, Cardiogenic
(complications)
- Treatment Outcome
|