Abstract | BACKGROUND: AIM: To compare the efficacy of three contrastive approach models in three different severities of phonological disorder. METHOD: Participants of the study were nine subjects with phonological disorders, with ages ranging between 4:2 and 6:6 years. All subjects were evaluated prior to and after phonological therapy. Three groups, with three subjects each, were determined for treatment. Each group presented one individual with severe, one with moderate-severe and one with mild-moderate phonological disorder. Each group was treated using a different therapy model--Minimal Opposition, Maximal Oppositions/Empty Set and Multiple Opposition. Results were analyzed according to the Friedman Test, considering p < 0.05; a descriptive analysis was also performed among the models. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference among the models considering the severity of phonological disorder. The Minimal and Maximal Oppositions/Empty Set approaches favored a greater number of sound acquisitions in the phonetic inventory of subjects with severe and moderate-severe disorder. On the other hand, the Multiple Oppositions approach favored a better performance of sound acquisition in the phonological system and a decrease in the impaired distinctive features in severe and moderate-severe disorder. CONCLUSION: The models of therapy were effective in the treatment of different severities of phonological disorders observing the best performance in children with severe and moderate-severe disorder.
|
Authors | Karina Carlesso Pagliarin, Helena Bolli Mota, Márcia Keske-Soares |
Journal | Pro-fono : revista de atualizacao cientifica
(Pro Fono)
2009 Oct-Dec
Vol. 21
Issue 4
Pg. 297-302
ISSN: 1809-399X [Electronic] Brazil |
PMID | 20098947
(Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)
|
Topics |
- Child
- Child, Preschool
- Data Interpretation, Statistical
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Phonetics
- Severity of Illness Index
- Speech Disorders
(therapy)
- Speech Therapy
(methods, standards)
|