Abstract |
This study evaluated the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two different types of foot orthoses used to treat plantar heel pain. Forty-eight patients were randomly assigned to receive either a functional or an accommodative orthosis. General (EuroQol) and specific (Foot Health Status Questionnaire) health-status measures were used. Data were also collected using economic questionnaires relating to National Health Service costs for podiatry, other health-service costs, and patient costs. Data were measured at baseline and at 4- and 8-week intervals. Thirty-five patients completed the study. The results demonstrated a significant decrease in foot pain and a significant increase in foot function with the functional foot orthoses over the 8-week trial. The accommodative foot orthoses demonstrated a significant reduction in foot pain only at 4 weeks. The cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrated that functional orthoses, although initially more expensive, result in a better quality of life. Use of functional orthoses resulted in an increased cost of pound 17.99 (32.74 dollars) per patient, leading to an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year of pound 1,650 (3,003 dollars) for functional orthoses.
|
Authors | Keith Rome, Joanne Gray, Fiona Stewart, Stephen Charles Hannant, Des Callaghan, Joanne Hubble |
Journal | Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association
(J Am Podiatr Med Assoc)
2004 May-Jun
Vol. 94
Issue 3
Pg. 229-38
ISSN: 8750-7315 [Print] United States |
PMID | 15153583
(Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
|
Topics |
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Feasibility Studies
- Heel
- Humans
- Middle Aged
- National Health Programs
- Orthotic Devices
(economics, standards)
- Pain Management
- Quality of Life
- United Kingdom
|