We compared the performance of 10-0
Novafil (
polybutester, Davis & Geck, American Cyanamid Company, New South Wales, Australia.) with that of 10-0
nylon (Alcon) in 60 patients undergoing extracapsular
cataract extraction and implantation of a posterior chamber
intraocular lens. A standard technique was used, and the incision was closed with interrupted
sutures of either 10-0
Novafil or 10-0
nylon. Length of follow up ranged from 6 to 26 months (average, 15 months). We assessed the intraoperative handling qualities of the
suture materials, as well as their effect on wound healing and
inflammation. We also compared the surgically-induced
astigmatism in the two
suture groups over the first 3 postoperative months and then in long-term follow up (average, 15 months).
Sutures removed at long-term follow up were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Both
suture materials handled easily at operation and were well tolerated by all patients. There was no significantly different surgically-induced
astigmatism in the two
suture groups after 12 weeks (P = .962) or during longer follow up (P = .401). SEM confirmed more advanced biodegradation of
nylon as compared with
Novafil sutures after they had been in place an average of 18 months.