Abstract | OBJECTIVES: METHODS: Forty patients were prospectively randomized to receive either a 24F re-entry Malecot nephrostomy tube (group A, n = 20) or a 7F tail stent with an 18F Councill nephrostomy tube (group B, n = 20) for postoperative drainage. Patients were evaluated with an analogue scale questionnaire 15 days after percutaneous nephrolithotomy at the routine office follow-up visit asking them to rate the flank pain on a 0 to 10 scale, urinary urgency on a 0 to 10 scale, and quality of life, while the external drainage tubes were still in place. RESULTS: The mean length of stay was 4.5 and 3.5 days for groups A and B, respectively. Flank urine leakage was present in all patients in group A for a period of 6 to 12 hours, and no patient in group B had any significant flank drainage. A statistically significant reduction of flank pain in favor of group B was observed (P = 0.0002). We did not observe any statistically significant difference when evaluating the urgency (P = 0.1) and quality-of-life scores (P = 0.09) between the two groups, even though a trend was noted toward amelioration in favor of group B patients. CONCLUSIONS:
|
Authors | Evangelos N Liatsikos, David Hom, Caner Z Dinlenc, Rakesh Kapoor, Mihai Alexianu, Paulos Yohannes, Arthur D Smith |
Journal | Urology
(Urology)
Vol. 59
Issue 1
Pg. 15-9
(Jan 2002)
ISSN: 1527-9995 [Electronic] United States |
PMID | 11796272
(Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
|
Topics |
- Drainage
(instrumentation)
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Length of Stay
- Nephrostomy, Percutaneous
(instrumentation)
- Pain, Postoperative
(prevention & control)
- Prospective Studies
- Quality of Life
- Stents
|