[Spontaneous perforation of the large intestine. Resection with primary anastomosis or staged (Hartmann) procedure?].

Abstract

Whereas primary resection to remove the septic focus stands undisputed in the therapy of spontaneous perforation of the colon, there is still no consensus as to whether to perform a primary anastomosis or a staged procedure (Hartmann). Prospective randomized studies comparing both concepts are lacking. Obviously these two competing therapies fit different groups of patients whose diseases differ concerning etiology, localisation and severity. Analysis of the literature of the past few years defined some criteria that help to decide when to omit primary anastomosis: MPI > 20, APACHE II score > 15, preoperative organ insufficiency, Hinchey grade III or IV and ASA score IV. In these cases a discontinuity resection is recommended. Primary resection with anastomosis and Hartmann procedure are not competing operations but situation-dependent therapeutic concepts in spontaneous colonic perforation.

• Authors: C Armbruster, S Kriwanek, R Roka
• Journal: Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen (Chirurg) Vol. 72 Issue 8 Pg. 910-3 (Aug 2001) ISSN: 0009-4722 [Print] Germany
• Vernacular Title: Spontane Dickdarmperforation. Resektion mit primärer Anastomose oder Diskontinuitätsresektion (Hartmann)?
• PMID: 11554135 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, English Abstract, Journal Article)

Topics

• Anastomosis, Surgical
• Humans
• Intestinal Perforation (etiology, mortality, surgery)
• Intestine, Large (surgery)
• Reoperation
• Rupture, Spontaneous
• Surgical Wound Dehiscence (etiology, mortality, surgery)
• Survival Rate
• Treatment Outcome